Jesper Nevalainen
Partner@hannessnellman.com
Patent, trademark, copyright, design, trade secret, you name it, we take care of it. Our clients value our advice and suggested solutions that serve their business now and in the long run. “I love working with them because they always have very practical advice. I was impressed with the team at both senior and junior levels”, says one of our clients (Chambers Europe). It is as simple as that. We love IP, and that is the reason why we provide excellent advice and results to our clients.
Hannes Snellman's Intellectual Property practice is one of the leading practices in the Finnish market. Our business-oriented IP team has vast experience in all aspects of intellectual property covering copyright, patents and utility models, designs, trademarks and domain names, as well as trade secrets. We deliver efficient and pragmatic execution of assignments in matters ranging from trademark filings to the most demanding and complex IP-related agreements and disputes.
The importance of intellectual property is inevitably increasing. With our clients’ business in focus, we assist in transforming intellectual capital in the form of an idea into an intellectual property right in order to secure intellectual property assets. Having the privilege to co-operate with several leading firms in their fields, we have gained an extensive experience and understanding in several sectors, such as Life Sciences, food and beverage, fashion, retail, software, telecommunications, the automotive industry, industrial equipment and solutions, media, entertainment, and sports.
As intellectual property is often the most valuable asset, and in order to maximise the value and goodwill of intellectual property in the era of digitalisation, it is important to have a clear vision and strategy. Our IP Commercial team provides our clients with strategic IP advice on how to protect, manage, market, license, and commercialise their intellectual property, as well as how to monetise said key assets in transactions and at every stage of their life cycle. Our IP Litigation team frequently acts as an IP sounding board to assess the issue at hand and to create tactics and strategies on how to resolve the issue. Furthermore, in a digitalised world, our clients need global strategic assistance and advice. In order to provide our clients with international and seamless high-quality legal services, we have created excellent relationships with leading law firms throughout the globe to ensure that such services are available at once wherever needed.
Our clients' intellectual property is what matters to us. Our IP Litigation team understands the need to retain the freedom to operate and obtain the best possible outcome under the circumstances of each case. In order to achieve the business goals of our clients, our seasoned and business-oriented litigators suggest litigation and settlement strategies that may consist, for example, of obtaining a fast interim injunction or other relief, settlement negotiations to resolve the case out of court and before trial, or creative but thorough tactics for litigation or arbitration.
In each case, we form a dedicated team of experts to correspond to the type and extent of the case and work closely with our Technology, Dispute Resolution, and Competition & Regulatory as well as Public Procurement practices. We represent our clients in Finnish authorities and courts as well as in the European Union Intellectual Property Office, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the Unified Patent Court (UPC). With regard to arbitration, we represent our clients in international arbitration institutes, such as the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, in addition to Finnish and Swedish arbitration institutes.
Our IP Litigation team frequently acts, for example in:
We understand the importance and value of intellectual property, which is inevitably increasing. More than ever, intellectual property is worth fighting for.
We advise our clients in all kinds of matters relating to life sciences, including groundbreaking and complex regulatory assignments that require an innovative approach and a broad knowledge of the Life Sciences sector. Our team regularly assists clients in contractual arrangements that are on the forefront of the current practice in the Nordic countries and that require close co-operation with the public procurement experts of our Public Procurement practice.
Both national and international clients routinely turn to us for advice in relation to intellectual property enforcement actions, compliance issues, as well as disputes regarding ethical codes of conduct, both within the pharmaceutical sector and in relation to medical devices and technologies.
Our team advises on several different types of contractual matters, such as R&D, licensing, clinical trials, and different kinds of co-operation models. Our IP Litigation team assists and represents our life sciences clients in disputes and our Marketing, Media, and Online Business team advises clients on marketing, regulatory, and product liability issues.
Our specialists have a hard time understanding why all lawyers are not into media and marketing law – it is so much fun! Advising on legal issues relating to marketing campaigns on- and offline, sales promotions and consumer competitions, as well as on various matters relating to social media, online and traditional media, and the related contractual and regulatory issues, is a part of our everyday business. We also handle consumer complaints and provide regulatory advice relating to marketing and consumer law. We assist our clients in proceedings with the local authorities and, if needed, participate in proceedings before the local courts.
We analyse the situation and, where necessary, take measures against unfair business practices by our clients' competitors and assist our clients in questions relating to packaging and labelling requirements, customer data, environmental and health claims, as well as product liability and recalls.
Sampo plc and Topdanmark A/S
Sampo plc's recommended public exchange offer for the shares in Topdanmark A/S
DKK 33 billion
Counsel to Sampo plc
Cargotec Corporation and Kalmar Corporation
Cargotec’s partial demerger and separation of Kalmar
Approx. EUR 2.0 billion (illustrative carve-out sales)
Counsel to Cargotec Corporation and Kalmar Corporation
Hannes Snellman successfully defended Continental Automotive GmbH (“Continental”) in an action brought by Nokia Technologies Oy (“Nokia”) concerning the right to claim priority for a patent. The Market Court held that the matter did not concern the registration or validity of a patent. The Market Court also held that Nokia lacked declaratory interest. Consequently, the Market Court found that it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the action without considering the merits as requested by Continental.
The Market Court ordered Nokia to compensate EUR 500,000 with legal interest to Continental for the legal costs incurred.
The decision is not final.
Parties
Accel-KKR, Aico Group, Juuri Partners
Transaction
Accel-KKR’s majority equity investment in Aico Group
Deal Value
Value not public
Role
Counsel to Accel-KKR, a global technology-focused investment firm
Hannes Snellman, together with Hogan Lovells and Gleiss Lutz, successfully represented Supponor entities in the Helsinki Local Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in a case concerning a digital overlay technology. As requested by the defendants, the court dismissed the patent holder’s preliminary injunction application and main action due to lack of jurisdiction, as the asserted patent had initially been opted-out from the UPC’s jurisdiction, and its subsequent attempted opt-out withdrawal was deemed ineffective under Art. 83 of the UPC Agreement due to pending national proceedings. This was the first oral hearing and first decision by the Helsinki Local Division of the UPC since the launch of the UPC on 1 June 2023
Hannes Snellman represented Finnish Red Cross First Aid in various trademark disputes before the Finnish Patent and Registration Office. We represented Finnish Red Cross First Aid in several trademark invalidation and revocations proceedings. One of the cases were ruled in favour of our client and the invalidation actions were dismissed. Two other cases were settled out of court and the adverse parties agreed to stop using infringing and misleading marks in their marketing and one adverse party agreed to cancel their trademark registration
Counsel to Anora, a leading alcoholic beverage brand company operating in wine and spirits markets in the Nordic and Baltic countries, in a dispute before the Market Court against Valvira, the National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health, regarding Anora Group’s right to disclose information on its key assets, i.e., key brands.
Counsel a public company in a copyright dispute before the Market Court and the Supreme Court concerning copyright and limitations to the exclusive rights of the copyright holder set forth in the Copyright Act.
Counsel to a Nordic group in a patent infringement and invalidation proceedings before the Market Court. The infringement case concerned both the direct infringement and doctrine of equivalents
Counsel to an international luxury brand in non-cancellation proceedings. The case was ruled in our client’s favour and the adverse party’s trademark was cancelled.
Counsel to a multinational technology company and its local distributor in patent infringement and invalidation proceedings before the Market Court. The cases were settled out of court.
Counsel to a movie producer of TV series and feature films regarding international distribution of an animated feature film. The film was initially released in the Nordics.
Counsel to Beneq, a leading developer and manufacturer of atomic layer disposition (ALD) technology and provider of R&D services in restructuring the group’s intellectual property holding to correspond to the requirements of the group’s business.
Sega Europe Limited and SEGA Corporation (Buyers) Rovio Entertainment Corporation (Target)
Counsel to Sega Europe Limited and SEGA Corporation in the recommended public cash tender offer for all shares and options in Rovio Entertainment Corporation.
Approximately EUR 706 million
Counsel to Sega Europe Limited and SEGA Corporation
Counsel to a major professional sports league in its trademark matters in Finland.
Counsel to a Finnish company in television programme cooperation related agreements.
Counsel to Red Cross First Aid in relation to several trademark cases as well as agreement update project.
Counsel to an energy industry company in all their data privacy matters.
Counsel in a comprehensive data protection audit.
Assessed the whistleblowing scheme of a multinational client.
Counsel to international client in copyright and music licensing matters.
Counsel to a distributor of a multinational medical device manufacturer in damages proceedings based on the Finnish Unfair Business Practices Act before the Market Court. The claimant right to claim damages was challenged, and the Market Court exceptionally rendered an interim decision allowing the defendant to apply for a leave to appeal from the Supreme Court. The case was settled out of court prior to the Supreme Court rendered its decision.
Sitowise (buyer), Bitcomp Oy (target)
Counsel to Sitowise in its acquisition of Bitcomp Oy
Value not public
Counsel to Sitowise
MEKO (buyer), Koivunen (target)
Counsel to MEKO in its acquisition of Koivunen, the provider of automotive spare parts and related services.
EUR 122 Million
Counsel to MEKO
Ahlström Capital BV and Nidoco AB (buyers), Ahlstrom-Munksjö (seller), Decor Solutions business area (target)
The buying consortium comprising Ahlström Capital BV and Nidoco AB, in the investment in the majority share of Ahlstrom-Munksjö’s Decor Solutions business area.
Value not public
Counsel to the buying consortium (Ahlström Capital BV and Nidoco AB)
Paulig Group (seller), Valio (buyer), Gold&Green brand, intellectual property and R&D function (target)
The divestment of Paulig’s Gold&Green brand, intellectual property and R&D function to Valio
Value not public
Counsel to Paulig Group
Counsel to a Nordic technology company in their consumer law and contractual matters.
Counsel to a Finnish food subscription company with its project for updating the general terms and marketing policy.
Enersense International Oyj, Megatuuli Oy
Enersense International Oyj, a provider of zero-emission energy solutions, has signed an agreement on acquiring shares of the onshore wind farm developer Megatuuli Oy.
EUR 18.5 million
Counsel to Enersense International
Counsel to Sanasto in disputes relating to the compensation paid for Finnish public literary lending. The Helsinki District Court ruled the cases in favour of our client and dismissed the cases. The Helsinki Court of Appeals did not change the ruling of the Helsinki District Court.
Virala Acquisition Company Plc, Purmo Group Ltd
Virala Acquisition Company Plc's merger with Purmo Group Ltd.
EUR 685 million
Counsel to Virala Acquisition Company Plc
PPG Industries, Inc. (Bidder), Tikkurila Oyj (Target)
Recommended public cash tender offer for all of the shares in Tikkurila by PPG Industries, Inc.
EUR 1.5 billion
Counsel to Tikkurila Oyj
Counsel to Finnish Bar Association in a dispute concerning the name of the association of other legal professionals before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found the name to be misleading and infringing and cancelled the registration of the name.
Counsel to a distributor of a multinational medical device manufacturer in a dispute regarding alleged misuse of trade secrets based on the Finnish Unfair Business Practices Act before the Market Court
Counsel to a multinational pharmaceutical company in preliminary injunction proceedings concerning biosimilars before the Market Court.
Counsel to Oy Santa Claus Ltd in their international agency arrangement.
Counsel to Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac in a dispute concerning unauthorised use of geographical indication before the Helsinki District Court. The dispute was settled on terms favourable to our client.
Counsel to an entertainment company in licensing TV Series internationally to several distributors.
Oriola Oyj and Kesko Oyj
A 50/50 percent joint venture to establish a chain of health, beauty and wellbeing stores across Finland, with the plan to expand the business to include pharmaceuticals if the legislation is amended
Value not public
Counsel to Oriola
Counsel to a Finnish public company in arbitration regarding a complex contractual software application licensing dispute. The arbitral award was rendered on terms favorable to our client.
Counsel to a Finnish public company in a domain name dispute before the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. The case was settled on terms favorable to our client and the disputed domain name was transferred to our client.
Counsel to a Finnish public company in an unfair business practices dispute before the Market Court. The adverse party’s claim regarding interim injunction was rejected and the case was settled on terms favorable to our client.
Counsel to multiple companies in the consumer electronics and telecommunications sectors on regulatory and product compliance matters.
“Hannes Snellman's lawyers have very valuable specific knowledge.”
"Service minded and personable."
"The Hannes Snellman IP (& Tech) team can handle a wide range of matters from traditional problems to very current and new aspects of the law."
"In particular, I like their expertise in retail and e-commerce/digitalisation matters."
"As a client or colleague you can rest assured that you get the right associate resourcing and that the matter will be handled by the right person. It also seems that the associates are very well supervised and led by their partners."