Peter ForsbergPartner | Stockholm
Hannes Snellman’s competition practice is a team of outstanding and diverse professionals with a genuine passion for competition law and for supporting our client’s business. Our competition team regularly advises clients on critical competition law issues in transactions, commercial agreements, and day-to-day business practices. The assignments are often challenging, complex, and extend beyond national borders, but they also include helping our client’s solve everyday competition-related questions. Our competition practice has exceptionally extensive experience of both international and domestic cases involving public and private antitrust enforcement, merger control, state aid, internal market and regulatory proceedings. Our expertise covers the full spectrum of both domestic and EU competition law, including the identification and assessment of competition concerns, helping to prevent issues through compliance programmes and trainings, and representing our clients before authorities, courts, or arbitral tribunals.
Our team has significant experience of complex public procurements, including competitive dialogues, procurement contracts, and strategies in tender procedures, as well as public procurement proceedings before courts. The team also has substantial experience of PPP projects as part of our Infrastructure & Energy practice.
Vida AB, Bergs Timber AB (publ)
Vida AB in the Acquisition of Bergs Timber AB’s (publ) Swedish Sawmill Business
SEK 400 million
Counsel to Vida AB
City of Espoo, Kumppanuuskoulut Oy, YIT Oyj, Meridiam Investments II
The City of Espoo signed a service agreement with Kumppanuuskoulut Oy on the implementation of five schools and three daycare centres
Approx. EUR 300 million
Counsel to City of Espoo
Rabbe Sittnikow, Jussi Ekonen, Janna Pihanurmi, Janne Veneranta, Roosa Väre, Markus Bremer, Maria Landtman, Samuli Pirinen, Heikki Vesikansa, Harri Vehviläinen, Piia Ahonen, Joakim Lavér
Eltel AB, Eltel AB (Aviation & Security business), Luftfartsverket
Eltel in the divestment of its Aviation & Security Business to Luftfarsverket
EUR 17 million
Counsel to Eltel AB
Counsel to Business Finland in public procurement of Business Finland Connection, a solution incorporating artificial intelligence, semantic search algorithms, and machine learning.
Counsel in strategic public procurement to Finavia Oyj, which maintains and developes all Finnish airports.
Wereldhave N.V. (Seller), Morgan Stanley Real Estate Investing (MSREI) (Buyer)
Wereldhave's divestment of the Itis shopping centre to a fund advised by Morgan Stanley Real Estate Investing (MSREI)
Approx. EUR 520 million
Counsel to Wereldhave N.V.
Mekonomen Aktiebolag (publ) (Buyer), FTZ Autodele & Værktøj A/S, INTER-TEAM Sp. z. o.o. (Targets)
Mekonomen's acquisition of FTZ Autodele & Værktøj A/S. the Danish market leader within automotive spare parts distribution and INTER-TEAM Sp. z. o.o., who has an established market position in the fast-growing and fragmented Polish automotive spare parts market.
EUR 395 million
Counsel to Mekonomen Aktiebolag (publ)
Orion Corporation (Seller), Axcel Management A/S (Buyer), Orion Diagnostica Oy (Target)
Orion Corporation's divestment of the diagnostics business unit Orion Diagnostica Oy to a private equity fund managed by Axcel Management A/S
Value not public
Counsel to Orion Corporation
OP Financial Group (Seller), Vienna Insurance Group (Buyer), Seesam Insurance AS (Target)
OP Financial Group's sale of the non-life insurance company Seesam Insurance AS (Seesam), including its Latvian and Lithuanian branches, to Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)
Value not public
Counsel to OP Financial Group
Nordic Packaging and Container Holdings (Seller), Mondi Group (Buyer), Powerflute Group Holdings Oy (Target)
Nordic Packaging and Container Holdings' sale of Powerflute Group Holdings Oy to a division of Mondi Group
Enterprise value of EUR 365 million
Counsel to Nordic Packaging and Container Holdings (NPAC Holdings)
Lemminkäinen Corporation and YIT Corporation
The combination of Lemminkäinen Corporation and YIT Corporation through a statutory merger
EUR 771 million
Counsel to Lemminkäinen
Oriola Oyj and Kesko Oyj
A 50/50 percent joint venture to establish a chain of health, beauty and wellbeing stores across Finland, with the plan to expand the business to include pharmaceuticals if the legislation is amended
Value not public
Counsel to Oriola
Counsel to the Finnish Transport Agency in a railway renovation project (alliance contract model) with a procurement value of approximately EUR 80 million (2015-2016).
Counsel to the winning tenderer in a high-tech documentation procurement project with a value of approximately EUR 65 million (2015-2016).
Counsel to the contracting authority in the design and construction of a social and healthcare centre (alliance contract model) with a procurement value of approximately EUR 50 million (2013-2016).
Counsel to the contracting authority in a development project (alliance contract model) with a procurement value of approximately EUR 30 million (2016).
Counsel to the petitioner in contesting an award decision on equipment procurement with a value of approximately EUR 150 million (2012-2016).
Counsel to the city of Tampere in a tramway design and construction project (alliance contract model) with a procurement value of approximately EUR 250 million (2014-2015).
Counsel to the contracting authority in a renovation project with a procurement value of approximately EUR 200 million (2015-2016).
Counsel to a major transportation company in an abuse of dominant market position and state aid case related to subventions allegedly received by a competitor.
Counsel to a Finnish public fund in state aid and competition law aspects of its major business development program.
Counsel to the complainants in the first state aid complaint to the European Commission against a Finnish municipal enterprise. According to the Commission’s preliminary view, the benefits granted to the municipal enterprise constitute state aid.
Counsel to a public company against the State of Finland in state aid recovery proceedings before the Finnish Administrative Courts. This is the first case where the European Commission’s negative state aid decision has led to national recovery proceedings being initiated in Finland against the recipient undertaking of the alleged unlawful aid.
Counsel to a Finnish listed company against the European Commission in the first-ever state aid litigation involving Finnish parties. The dispute concerned whether the State of Finland violated the EC Treaty by granting unlawful state aid to our client. The Court of First Instance of the European Communities (“CFI”) ruled in favour of our client and annulled the Commission’s decision on alleged state aid. The Commission decided not to appeal against the CFI’s judgement.
Counsel to a number of parties in state aid complaints against Finnish municipal enterprises.
Counsel to a leading bank in its acquisition of a listed insurance company, notifying the deal to the FCA and coordinating multi-jurisdictional filings.
Counsel to a leading telecommunications company in a complex merger control case, which was conditionally cleared by the FCA. Following appeals by several competitors, the transaction was prohibited. In an important precedent, the Supreme Administrative Court overturned the decision as the competitors were deemed not to have any right of appeal, which thus enabled our client to successfully complete the transaction.
Counsel to an international conglomerate in its acquisition of a public Finnish company. The transaction was notified to the European Commission, which made a conditional Phase 1 clearance decision, thus enabling our client to close the transaction within the desired timetable.
Counsel to a leading retailer in setting up a Baltic joint venture, including the first merger control notification to the European Commission concerning the Baltic countries post-enlargement.
Counsel to an international media group in its acquisition of first joint and subsequently sole control of a leading Finnish media company, both stages including multi-jurisdictional filings.
Counsel to a globally active company in its acquisition of another public company through a tender offer, handling the notification to the European Commission and coordinating the national filings in jurisdictions outside the EU.
Counsel to the notifying party in two separate media transactions, both unconditionally cleared by the Finnish Competition Authority (FCA) following in-depth Phase 2 investigations.
Counsel to a global oil and gas company on the divestment of its refining and retail business in Finland and Sweden.
Counsel to two international paper manufacturers in a transaction that was notified to the European Commission and a number of national competition authorities outside the EU. After Phase 2 proceedings, the Commission cleared the transaction without any conditions.
Counsel to a private equity investment firm in relation to the merger of its portfolio company with a competitor, notifying the deal to the competition authorities in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Russia, Poland and Germany.
Counsel to an international private equity investment firm on the acquisition of a Finnish grocery retailing chain. The transaction was notified to and cleared by the European Commission.
Counsel to a public company on the competition law aspects of a joint venture with a competitor. The transaction was notified to and cleared by the competition authorities in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Poland, Estonia, Russia and Ukraine.
Counsel to Sentica’s portfolio company Trust Kapital, a company specializing in receivables lifecycle management and financing, in its acquisition of Enfo Zender, Enfo Oyj’s information logistics subsidiary.
Counsel to Henri Juva in the sale of a majority of shares in Quattro Mikenti Group Oy to Adelis Equity Partners Fund I AB by Henri Juva and other sellers.
Counsel to Kesko Corporation in securing unconditional merger control clearance from the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority for its acquisition of Kalatukku E. Eriksson Ltd., a Finnish fish processor and wholesaler.
Counsel to a Finnish listed company against the Finnish Competition Authority in complex administrative proceedings concerning the authority’s obligation to produce documents to the parties involved in regulatory investigations. Our team of specialists successfully represented the client before the Supreme Administrative Court and obtained a precedential decision extending the parties’ access to documents.
Counsel to a major telecommunications company in court proceedings relating to a decision by the Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority, which had found our client to have significant market power in the market for call termination. Upon appeal, the Supreme Administrative Court annulled that decision and remitted the matter for new appraisal.
Counsel to one of the leading mobile operators in proceedings against another mobile operator who required access to our client’s mobile network. A successful outcome was achieved as both the FCA and the appeal court held that our client did not have any obligation to grant access to its network.
Counsel to a Finnish bank in EU cartel proceedings. The Commission alleged that our client – together with various other European banks – had infringed EU competition law by agreeing on charges for the exchange of Euro-zone currencies. The Commission dropped the case after we had successfully defended the client bank’s position.
Counsel to a major telecommunications company in three closely related court and arbitration proceedings in which certain other telecom companies claimed damages exceeding MEUR 500 from our client. They alleged that our client had abused a dominant position. All three private enforcement actions were successfully settled out of court.
Counsel to a listed Finnish company in complex cartel investigations by the FCA. Following proceedings that lasted more than four years – encompassing numerous requests for information, interviews and a statement of objections – the FCA closed the case without making any penalty payment proposal to the Market Court.
Counsel to a multinational company in a case where the FCA had proposed that the Market Court should impose a fine for alleged restrictions of parallel imports in the market for digital cameras. Both the Market Court and the Supreme Administrative Court rejected the penalty payment proposal in its entirety.
Counsel to a Finnish listed company against the FCA in the largest-ever cartel proceedings brought before Finnish courts, where the proposed fines on the basis of alleged bid-rigging and market sharing amounted to MEUR 97.
Counsel to a leading company in a matter concerning alleged resale price maintenance, to date the largest case in Finland concerning vertical restrictions.
Counsel to a public company in a cartel investigation, where the Finnish Competition Authority (FCA) ceased the handling of the case without finding any infringement.
Counsel to an international company in private enforcement litigation, where the claimant seek damages from our client alleging that the agreement between the parties infringed competition rules. In one of the first private enforcement rulings by Finnish general courts, the District Court ruled in favour of our client dismissing all claims. Upon appeal, the Court of Appeal upheld the decision.
Counsel to clients in a number of large pending public and private enforcement procedures.
Counsel to a leading consumer goods retailer in large-scale self-assessments of its activities previously based on numerous exemptions granted by the Finnish Competition Authority.
Counsel to a global company in an extensive competition law audit, comprising document review and interviews, and covering the Nordic countries and Russia.
Counsel to a public company in a group-wide compliance program, including compliance training sessions in Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands.
Counsel to an international group executing a large-scale compliance program. Our tasks comprised competition law audits, multiple compliance training sessions in several countries, the preparation of compliance manuals and dawn raid guidelines, and the creation of internal review and follow-up systems.
Counsel to the contracting entity against another governmental organization in a precedential damages litigation based on purported breach of public procurement rules in a competitive bidding for the construction of a motor highway, the value of which exceeded MEUR 50.
Counsel to the contracting entity at the Supreme Administrative Court in a public procurement case concerning utilisation of waste as energy. This is one of the largest public procurement matters that have been the subject of legal proceedings in Finland – the value of the procurement totalling MEUR 282.
Counsel to a Finnish municipal waste management enterprise in a public procurement case concerning the construction of a Waste-to-Energy plant – the value of the procurement totalling MEUR 130.
Counsel to a Finnish listed company against a state-owned company in a landmark damages litigation regarding the compensation of direct and indirect losses under the Finnish Sale of Goods Act. The case resulted in a precedent issued by the Supreme Court of Finland.
Counsel to the claimant in a precedent appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court against the Finnish Government’s decision to allocate radio licences.
Counsel to a theatre operator in a public procurement case concerning the renovation construction of a theatre building – the value of the procurement totalling EUR 50 million.
Counsel to the contracting entity in a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) project regarding the construction and maintenance of a motorway section. The total value of the project was EUR 623 million.